Waymo data shows humans are terrible drivers compared to AI
Now operating in cities like L.A.,关键字2 San Francisco, Phoenix, Austin, and Atlanta, the robotaxis of Waymo have driven nearly 57 million miles, according to the autonomous vehicle company. With all those miles under its (timing) belt, the Alphabet-owned operation recently released a research paper highlighting some impressive data. Waymo's report centered on incidents between its vehicles and "vulnerable road users." Compared to human drivers, Waymo's self-driving, electric Jaguars encountered 92 percent fewer crashes with pedestrians that resulted in injuries, 82 percent fewer crashes with cyclists involving injuries, and 82 percent fewer crashes with injuries that involved motorcyclists. There was also good news for car-to-car crashes, with 96 percent fewer injury-involving intersection crashes among Waymos, compared to human drivers, and 85 percent fewer crashes with suspected serious or worse injuries. "It’s encouraging to see real-world data showing Waymo outperforming human drivers when it comes to safety," Jonathan Adkins, Chief Executive Officer at the nonprofit Governors Highway Safety Administration, said in Waymo's press release. "Fewer crashes and fewer injuries — especially for people walking and biking — is exactly the kind of progress we want to see from autonomous vehicles." With Waymo planning additional service in Washington, D.C., Miami, and Tokyo, can we expect further progress in road safety in the cities Waymo operates in? Possibly, says David Kidd, the Senior Research Scientist at the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. While Waymo has demonstrated its individual cars are often safer than human drivers, the company's service is not ubiquitous enough to show that it makes a city's entire road network safer, Kidd tells Mashable. Waymo's effective technology and positive safety record are good signs that we may get there one day, Kidd adds. Kidd: Waymo has done several of these reports, and they have been diligent about being very transparent about the methods they used to get the data they have. They’ve built on and expanded on previous [reports]. This is ... the most comprehensive look of the safety of their AVs to date, and the results are really encouraging. I can’t speak to Waymo's strategy and philosophy and the differences between Waymo and Cruise and other AV companies, but certainly what stands out is Waymo is making a concerted effort to do research demonstrating the safety of the vehicles on real roads and being public about it. So they publish the research, and they also are now putting information about crashes and exposure, or millions driven in different deployment areas, on their website so anyone can go and replicate what they’ve done or do their own analyses. No other company is doing that right now, and it’s something we would hope other companies would follow Waymo’s lead in and be transparent. Crashes with pedestrians have been increasing since 2009; I think there's been an 83 percent increase in fatal pedestrian crashes since that year (Kidd is referencing a report from 2022, showing a 40-year high for pedestrians killed by cars). And it certainly is the case that these automated vehicles are really good at keeping themselves from getting into conflicts with pedestrians, as this study provides evidence for; it’s going to help with the issue. The caveat is that AVs are not deployed everywhere, they’re certainly not in everyone’s driveway and not accessible to everyone so if we’re really going to tackle that pedestrian crash problem, it’s going to take multiple types of counter measures and solutions ranging from the technology in cars we can buy today like pedestrian automatic braking, changes in infrastructure that reduces conflicts between pedestrians and vehicles, as well as changing things that can make drivers more aware, as well as pedestrians aware, of their surroundings and pay more attention to distracted driving and distracted walking. The natural extension of what Waymo has done is to better understand how the deploying of their vehicles inside of a city or inside a transportation network affects the overall safety of that network. They’ve done a good job of showing several times that their vehicles crash less often and are involved in fewer crashes than humans in that same deployment area. What they need to show is, if they have 100 Waymo vehicles or 1,000 Waymo vehicles, then is the transportation system in that area safer for everyone? That’s kind of the next piece — do we get shared safety benefits? Waymo really demonstrated they can develop a technology and algorithms that take sensor information and make the vehicle operate safely. Can we take some of those learnings and improvements and apply them to the technology in vehicles you and I can buy? There’s a rumor they are potentially collaborating with Toyota; hopefully that’s one thing that comes out of it — Waymo takes their gains and algorithms and software and what they’ve done in the self-driving arena and apply it and translate it into the safety technology that Toyota and other automakers put into the vehicles that are sold to consumers today. That’s where I think you’ll see more rapid advances where the AVs advance conventional vehicles. Some of the more proactive things are when you’re approaching an intersection and the vehicle is able to see that there are other cars coming and make a prediction that some other vehicles are going to cross your path and not going to stop — it’ll slow you down to avoid the conflict. AVs can illustrate the potential and some reasons why human drivers slip in terms of behavior and the way they operate vehicles and why they get in crashes. It’s not anything that’s unknown to us right now. The biggest contributor to crash deaths, and have been perpetual really, is speeding, impairment, like alcohol impairment, distractions is another component, but really speeding and impairment are huge and automated vehicles follow laws; they don’t speed and they’re not impaired. That alone is going to eliminate a lot of deaths.
You May Also LikeWhat are your takeaways from Waymo's recent safety report?
Compared to other AV efforts from Tesla and General Motors' Cruise, Waymo seems to be finding the most success. Why?
The number of pedestrians and cyclists killed by cars has been steadily climbing for years. Can Waymo make the argument that they can help reduce those numbers?
Since consumers cannot buy their own AVs yet, will we see significant decreases in crash deaths when automated cars are only available on a rideshare basis?
Related Stories Tell us more about how AV technology can help all cars be safer.
- 最近发表
-
- 韩国思密达的暖身汤:辣白菜金枪鱼豆腐汤
- 一点资讯任旭阳发布公开信:新一轮融资或将完成
- 字母哥力挺詹姆斯:不会真有人以为最伟大球员没技术吧?
- 幼儿园托班英语教案(精选15篇)
- Black hole shot a beam through space. NASA snapped stunning footage.
- 一点资讯任旭阳发布公开信:新一轮融资或将完成
- 高考百日誓师主题班会教案(精选11篇)
- 高三主题班会课件(精选6篇)
- 13 Unlucky Places to Avoid on Friday the 13th
- Watch Call of Duty®: NEXT and Earn Rewards in Modern Warfare® III
- 随机阅读
-
- Dương Ngọc Thái ở tuổi 46: Ở nhà phố 6 tầng, bớt ham chơi khi có con
- 高三励志主题班会(精选6篇)
- 小学开学主题班会教案(精选6篇)
- 《三国志13》战斗诛杀攻略
- 稳定交往!白石麻衣前往菊池风磨住处
- A NASA rover just exposed something on Mars that eluded orbiters
- 分类垃圾桶里的垃圾真的会分类处置吗?
- 高三主题班会教案大全(精选11篇)
- 在组策略编辑器中禁用“添加或删除程序”
- 时尚分类垃圾桶 扔垃圾,也可以很时尚
- 广州男篮力克山西迎队史季后赛首胜,扳回一城留住悬念
- 第一个没有父亲的父亲节说说 父亲节的伤感说说
- Steam新品节前瞻:《死亡日:狂杀末路》试玩版和全新预告现已公布!
- 医师年度个人总结报告(范文5篇)
- Watch Call of Duty®: NEXT and Earn Rewards in Modern Warfare® III
- Gunsmith Innovations: Introducing Aftermarket Parts and More to Call of Duty: Modern Warfare III
- 控股党委书记赵东一行莅临环境指导工作
- 金铲铲之战先知烈娜塔阵容玩法攻略
- 【】民宿太空舱
- 宁波街道开出首张生活垃圾分类整改通知书!
- 搜索
-
- 友情链接
-